$6514.00 v. State
This text of $6514.00 v. State ($6514.00 v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-12-0117-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
MAY 31, 2012 ______________________________
$6514.00,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _________________________________
FROM THE 99th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2004-526,853; HON. WILLIAM C. SOWDER, PRESIDING ________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION ___________________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Appellant Bennie L. Collins filed a notice of appeal on March 26, 2012, from a
default judgment signed on February 28, 2005. No motion for new trial or like request
extending the appellate deadline was filed. Consequently, appellant had until March 30,
2005, to file a notice of appeal. He did not do so. Thereafter, we afforded him
opportunity to explain why his notice was untimely and why we had jurisdiction over the
appeal. This resulted in his response filed on May 25, 2012. Why he did not perfect his appeal within thirty days of February 28, 2005, went unexplained, however. Moreover,
the allegations in his response did not satisfy the requirements of Texas Rule of Civil
Procedure 306a(4), which rule permits the belated perfection of an appeal when neither
the litigant or his counsel garnered notice or knowledge of the final judgment. See TEX.
R. CIV. P. 306a(5) (prescribing the steps that must be satisfied to obtain the benefits of
Rule 306a(4)). Given these circumstances, we cannot but conclude that we lack
jurisdiction over the appeal. Thus, it is dismissed.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
$6514.00 v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/651400-v-state-texapp-2012.