64 Park Ave. Corp. v. Blum
This text of 191 Misc. 650 (64 Park Ave. Corp. v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The ground assigned by the landlord for terminating the lease, as stated in its letter of June 17, 1947, is not applicable or authorized under paragraph VI of the lease. In our opinion, it has no application to conduct or acts committed off the demised premises. We are also of opinion' that the provisions of subdivision 6 of section 1410 of the Civil Practice Act are suspended during the existence of the Business Bent Law and that there is no evidence that the tenant used or was using the demised space for illegal purposes (§ 8, subd. [b], cl. [2] ; L. 1945, ch. 314).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 Misc. 650, 78 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/64-park-ave-corp-v-blum-nyappterm-1948.