6344 Legend Falls Trust v. National Default Servicing Corporation
This text of 6344 Legend Falls Trust v. National Default Servicing Corporation (6344 Legend Falls Trust v. National Default Servicing Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A. Krista J. Nielson, Esq. 2 Nevada Bar No. 10698 3 10100 W. Charleston Boulevard, Suite 220 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 4 Telephone: 702 258-8200 Fax: 702 258-8787 5 Attorneys for Defendant National Default Servicing Corporation and Specialized Loan 6 Servicing LLC
7 TB #22-72748
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 6344 LEGEND FALLS TRUST, a Nevada Case No.: 2:22-cv-01023-GMN-NJK 11 trust, 12 ORDER TO EXTEND Plaintiff, DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE 13 (SECOND REQUEST) vs. 14
15 NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, an Arizona corporation; 16 SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; 17 NEVADA LEGAL NEWS, LLC, a Nevada 18 limited liability company; DOES I through X and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X 19 inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 Plaintiff, 6344 Legend Falls Trust (hereinafter “Legend” or “Plaintiff”) and Defendants, 23 Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC (“SLS”) and National Default Servicing Corporation 24 (“NDSC”) (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate 25 and agree to extend the dispositive motion deadline thirty (30) days, until May 3, 2023. This is 26 the parties’ second request for an extension of the dispositive motion deadline as the first was 27 denied without prejudice. 28 /././ /././ 1 1. Plaintiff filed its complaint of April 8, 2022, in Eighth Judicial District Court. (ECF No. 2 1). 3 2. The matter was later removed to this Court on June 29, 2022. (ECF No. 1). 4 3. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on July 18, 2022. (ECF No. 12). 5 Defendants then filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint on August 1, 2022. 6 (ECF No. 15). The Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint was fully briefed as of 7 August 22, 2022. (ECF No. 23). 8 4. Plaintiff subsequently filed a Motion to Remand on September 9, 2022. ECF No. 2*). 9 The Motion to Remand is fully briefed as of September 30, 2022. (ECF No. 30). 10 5. The Court entered an initial discovery plan and scheduling order on September 6, 2022, 11 setting an April 3, 2023, dispositive motions deadline. (ECF No. 26). 12 6. Plaintiff and Defendants are discussing potential settlement regarding this matter. The 13 parties are also working to resolve a discovery dispute regarding deposition topics of 14 NDSC and SLS. 15 7. Both the Motion to Remand and Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint are potentially 16 dispositive motions regarding this matter. See Sean K. Claggett & Associates, LLC v. 17 Keenan, No. 2:21-cv-02237, 2022 WL 2788441, *2 (D. Nev. Jul.14, 2022 (finding a 18 Motion to Remand potentially dispositive as it concerns jurisdiction). 19 8. As of the date of this filing, the Court has not issued an order on Defendants’ Motion to 20 Dismiss Amended Complaint or Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. 21 9. It has been more than ninety days since both Motion to Remand and Motion to Dismiss 22 Amended Complaint were fully briefed. 23 10. Discovery Completed: Plaintiffs and Defendants have made disclosures of witnesses and 24 documents and Defendants have propounded discovery requests. Defendants noticed the 25 Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Plaintiff and Plaintiff noticed the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of 26 NDSC and SLS. As discussed above, the parties are meeting and conferring regarding 27 the deposition topics for SLS and NDSC. 28 /././ /././ ] 11. The parties assert good cause exists to extend the dispositive motion deadline as the 2 parties require additional time to complete the depositions of NDSC and SLS and 3 resolve their discovery disputes prior to the filing of dispositive motions. 4 12. Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully stipulate and request that the Court exten 5 the dispositive motion deadline for thirty (30) days until May 3, 2023. 6 || DATED this 21“ day of February, 2023 DATED this 21* day of February, 2023 7 || TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A. HONG & HONG LAW OFFICE /s/ Krista J. Nielson, Esq. /s/ Joseph Y. Hong, Esq. 9 || Krista J. Nielson, Esq. Joseph Y. Hong, Esq. Nevada State Bar No. 10698 Nevada Bar No: 5995 10 || 10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 220 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650 11 || Las Vegas, NV 89135 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for 6344 Legend Falls Trust 12 || National Default Servicing Corporation and 3 Specialized Loan Servicing LLC 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 ZS QQ ee. 17 UNITED STA .TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case No.: 2:22-cv-01023-GMN-NJK 18 19 DATED: February 22, 2023 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6344 Legend Falls Trust v. National Default Servicing Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/6344-legend-falls-trust-v-national-default-servicing-corporation-nvd-2023.