6340 Transit Road, Inc. v. Unigard Security Insurance
209 A.D.2d 922, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1015
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1994·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in shielding an attorney’s opinion letter from disclosure. The letter was protec ted by the attorney-client privilege. That privilege was not waived by the inadvertent disclosure of the letter (see, Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v Servotronics, Inc., 132 AD2d 392). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.—Disclosure.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
6340 Transit Road, Inc. v. Unigard Security Insurance, 209 A.D.2d 922, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
209 A.D.2d 922 (6340 Transit Road, Inc. v. Unigard Security Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Terry
1 Misc. 3d 475 (New York County Courts, 2003)
Baliva v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
275 A.D.2d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)