63 West 104th Street Owner LLC v. James River Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedAugust 3, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-05935
StatusUnknown

This text of 63 West 104th Street Owner LLC v. James River Insurance Company (63 West 104th Street Owner LLC v. James River Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
63 West 104th Street Owner LLC v. James River Insurance Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x

63 WEST 104TH STREET OWNER LLC and 1 OAK CONTRACTING LLC,

Plaintiffs,

-v- No. 20 CV 5935-LTS

JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

-------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER

WHEREAS, this action was commenced by the filing of a Complaint on July 31, 2020 (Docket Entry No. 5); and

WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed such Complaint to ascertain the basis for assertion of subject matter jurisdiction in this court; and

WHEREAS, such Complaint asserts that the Court has jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship (28 U.S.C. § 1332), but does not allege facts sufficient to determine the citizenship of the members of plaintiffs 63 West 104th Street Owner LLC and 1 Oak Contracting LLC; and

WHEREAS, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, the citizenship of an artificial business entity other than a corporation is determined by reference to the citizenship of its members, see C.T. Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185 (1990); E.R. Squibb & Sons v. Accident & Cas. Ins. Co., 160 F.3d 925 (2d Cir. 1998); Keith v. Black Diamond Advisors, Inc., 48 F. Supp. 2d 326 (S.D.N.Y. 1999); and

WHEREAS, "'subject matter jurisdiction is an unwaivable sine qua non for the exercise of federal judicial power,'" E.R. Squibb & Sons, 160 F.3d at 929 (citation omitted), and Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that "If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action;" it is hereby

ORDERED, that plaintiff shall, no later than August 14, 2020, file and serve a Supplement to the Complaint containing allegations sufficient to demonstrate a basis for subject matter jurisdiction in this Court or otherwise show cause in writing as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York August 3, 2020

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carden v. Arkoma Associates
494 U.S. 185 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Keith v. Black Diamond Advisors, Inc.
48 F. Supp. 2d 326 (S.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 West 104th Street Owner LLC v. James River Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/63-west-104th-street-owner-llc-v-james-river-insurance-company-nysd-2020.