622 Building Co., L. L. C. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

622 Building Co., L. L. C. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield

283 A.D.2d 202, 724 N.Y.S.2d 300, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4787

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 202 (622 Building Co., L. L. C. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

622 Building Co., L. L. C. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 283 A.D.2d 202, 724 N.Y.S.2d 300, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about March 16, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted plaintiff partial summary judgment on liability on its first and second causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to submit any evidence to support its assertion, made in detail for the first time on appeal, that it was unreasonably barred by plaintiff from moving out of the subject building during regular business hours. Defendant has also failed to offer evidence supporting its assertion that its employees signed invoices for the disputed charges under duress (see, Kranitz v Strober Org., 181 AD2d 441). We have not given any weight to the affidavit of defendant’s employee offered for the first time on sur-reply, even though we earlier declined to strike that affidavit from the record. In any event, that affidavit would not warrant a different result. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about March 16, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted plaintiff partial summary judgment on liability on its first and second causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to submit any evidence to support its assertion, made in detail for the first time on appeal, that it was unreasonably barred by plaintiff from moving out of the subject building during regular business hours. Defendant has also failed to offer evidence supporting its assertion that its employees signed invoices for the disputed charges under duress (see, Kranitz v Strober Org., 181 AD2d 441). We have not given any weight to the affidavit of defendant’s employee offered for the first time on sur-reply, even though we earlier declined to strike that affidavit from the record. In any event, that affidavit would not warrant a different result. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 202, 724 N.Y.S.2d 300, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/622-building-co-l-l-c-v-empire-blue-cross-blue-shield-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack