620 Broadway Housing Corp. v. City Planning Commission

12 A.D.3d 215, 783 N.Y.S.2d 805, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13180

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibble F. Payne, J.), entered December 5, 2003, which denied petitioners’ application to annul respondent City Planning Commission’s (CPC) determination granting respondent developer a special use permit and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No basis exists to disturb CPC’s finding that the single expression of interest received by the developer in response to its efforts to rent the space for a permitted use (NY City Zoning Resolution § 74-781) was not bona fide (see Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591, 598 [1977]; Matter of Supkis v Town of Sand Lake Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 227 AD2d 779, 781 [1996]). Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

620 Broadway Housing Corp. v. City Planning Commission, 12 A.D.3d 215, 783 N.Y.S.2d 805, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

12 A.D.3d 215 (620 Broadway Housing Corp. v. City Planning Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Supkis v. Town of Sand Lake Zoning Board of Appeals
227 A.D.2d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)