5F, LLC v. Boca Grande Isle LLC

261 So. 3d 654
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 2018
DocketCase Nos. 2D17-949; 2D17-1155 CONSOLIDATED
StatusPublished

This text of 261 So. 3d 654 (5F, LLC v. Boca Grande Isle LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
5F, LLC v. Boca Grande Isle LLC, 261 So. 3d 654 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.

*655We affirm the trial court's entry of final summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs1 on count one of the complaint and the plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants2 on count one of the amended counterclaim in Case No. 15-CA-001157. The restrictions on the use of Lot 99 of Boca Grande Isles (BGI), as set forth in the 1974 Declaration of Restrictions that binds all of the lot owners of BGI (the Declaration), run with the land and may be amended only upon the unanimous consent of all of the lot owners of BGI. See Van Loan v. Heather Hills Prop. Owners Ass'n, 216 So.3d 18, 23 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("Because there was no express delegation of authority to the [property owners association] to amend the restrictive covenants, the restrictive covenants can only be amended by the consent of all the property owners in the subdivision." (citing Roth v. Springlake II Homeowners Ass'n, 533 So.2d 819, 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) ) ). The plaintiffs' and counterclaim defendants' later purchases of their lots did not effect a novation of the Declaration to the extent that it sets forth restrictions that run with the land and constitute a contract among all of the lot owners. Cf. Jakobi v. Kings Creek Vill. Townhouse Ass'n, 665 So.2d 325, 327 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (holding, in the context of personal contractual obligations between a townhouse owner and the master and townhouse associations, that the transfer of a townhouse deed, "rather than effecting a mere assignment, constituted a novation of the bylaws and declaration of covenants and restrictions as between the Master Association, the Townhouse Association, and the owner" (emphasis added) ).

Because we hold that affirmance is warranted on this basis, we do not comment on the trial court's alternative conclusion, as set forth at paragraphs 30 through 36 of the magistrate judge's thorough and well-reasoned *656report and recommendation of September 1, 2016.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roth v. SPRINGLAKE II HOMEOWNERS ASS'N, INC.
533 So. 2d 819 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Jakobi v. Kings Creek Village Townhouse Ass'n
665 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Erick Van Loan v. Heather Hills Property Owners Association, Inc.
216 So. 3d 18 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 So. 3d 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/5f-llc-v-boca-grande-isle-llc-fladistctapp-2018.