585 A.P. Lenox Associates v. 585 Lenox Avenue Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

585 A.P. Lenox Associates v. 585 Lenox Avenue Associates

194 A.D.2d 380, 598 N.Y.S.2d 264

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered December 29, 1992, which denied appellants’ motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, unanimously affirmed. Order of the same court and Justice, entered March 3, 1993, which denied appellants’ motion for a stay and to fix an undertaking, pending appeal, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In 1989, plaintiff commenced an action to foreclose a mortgage, which it held on 101 West 140th Street, New York County (premises), against 585 Lenox Avenue Associates (Associates) and related entities, based upon Associates’ default on mortgage payments. When that foreclosure action was commenced, defendants were month-to-month tenants in those premises.

Thereafter, the IAS Court issued a judgment of foreclosure and sale, and, subsequently, by Referee’s deed, the premises were sold to Kromo Lenox Associates, which is not a party herein. Kromo then moved to evict defendants. In any event there is no requirement that defendants be served with a Notice of Pendency, summons and complaint. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered December 29, 1992, which denied appellants’ motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, unanimously affirmed. Order of the same court and Justice, entered March 3, 1993, which denied appellants’ motion for a stay and to fix an undertaking, pending appeal, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In 1989, plaintiff commenced an action to foreclose a mortgage, which it held on 101 West 140th Street, New York County (premises), against 585 Lenox Avenue Associates (Associates) and related entities, based upon Associates’ default on mortgage payments. When that foreclosure action was commenced, defendants were month-to-month tenants in those premises.

Thereafter, the IAS Court issued a judgment of foreclosure and sale, and, subsequently, by Referee’s deed, the premises were sold to Kromo Lenox Associates, which is not a party herein. Kromo then moved to evict defendants. In any event there is no requirement that defendants be served with a Notice of Pendency, summons and complaint. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

585 A.P. Lenox Associates v. 585 Lenox Avenue Associates, 194 A.D.2d 380, 598 N.Y.S.2d 264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

194 A.D.2d 380 (585 A.P. Lenox Associates v. 585 Lenox Avenue Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related