5757 Associates v. Blanford
This text of 69 A.D.3d 539 (5757 Associates v. Blanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Even though plaintiff had moved for summary judgment, the motion court had authority to grant summary judgment to the nonmoving defendant (CELR 3212 [b]). The court properly dismissed the complaint on undisputed facts. The lease between the parties required plaintiff to give notice of a default to Syoum, the assignor of the lease. Plaintiff’s failure to give Syoum such notice constituted a breach of its obligations under the lease (see Poole v Pellati, 251 AD2d 480, 481-482 [1998], Iv dismissed 92 NY2d 1002 [1998]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 31025(U).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 A.D.3d 539, 892 N.Y.2d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/5757-associates-v-blanford-nyappdiv-2010.