5350 PARK, LLC, etc. v. GRYCON, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

5350 PARK, LLC, etc. v. GRYCON, LLC, etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 2022

Docket21-1097

StatusPublished

This text of 5350 PARK, LLC, etc. v. GRYCON, LLC, etc. (5350 PARK, LLC, etc. v. GRYCON, LLC, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

5350 PARK, LLC, etc. v. GRYCON, LLC, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 23, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1097 Lower Tribunal No. 20-11660 ________________

5350 Park, LLC, etc., Appellant,

vs.

Grycon, LLC, etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami- Dade County, William Thomas, Judge.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Felix X. Rodriguez and Kelly R. Melchiondo, for appellant.

Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., and Richard H. Critchlow and Deborah S. Corbishley, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Young v. Achenbauch, 136 So. 3d 575, 581 (Fla. 2014)

(explaining that a lawyer may not drop a preexisting client in favor of a new

client where the representation of both clients constitutes a conflict, i.e., the

“hot potato” rule).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI