52 & 58-27th Street, Jackson Heights, Inc. v. Keeler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

52 & 58-27th Street, Jackson Heights, Inc. v. Keeler

260 A.D. 873, 22 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 873 (52 & 58-27th Street, Jackson Heights, Inc. v. Keeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

52 & 58-27th Street, Jackson Heights, Inc. v. Keeler, 260 A.D. 873, 22 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for rent by a corporate owner, based upon a sealed instrument executed by another corporation “ as Agent ” without there being any mention by name of the principal for whom the latter corporation was acting as agent. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground (a) that the plaintiff could not maintain an action as undisclosed principal upon the instrument invoked; and (b) that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for rent by a corporate owner, based upon a sealed instrument executed by another corporation “ as Agent ” without there being any mention by name of the principal for whom the latter corporation was acting as agent. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground (a) that the plaintiff could not maintain an action as undisclosed principal upon the instrument invoked; and (b) that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 873, 22 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/52-58-27th-street-jackson-heights-inc-v-keeler-nyappdiv-1940.