511 Equities Corp. v. Town of East Hampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

511 Equities Corp. v. Town of East Hampton

214 A.D.2d 565, 625 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3458

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 A.D.2d 565 (511 Equities Corp. v. Town of East Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

511 Equities Corp. v. Town of East Hampton, 214 A.D.2d 565, 625 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the Town of East Hampton appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cromarty, J.), entered March 11, 1993, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the claimant and against it in the principal amount of $181,240, less a credit for any advance payment previously paid by the Town of East Hampton.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court’s factual determination as to the suitability of the claimant’s comparables is supported by the record and will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Phelps Dodge Indus. v Kondzielaski, 131 AD2d 675; Matter of Katz v Assessor of Vil./ Town of Mount Kisco, 82 AD2d 654; see also, Matter of City of New York [Reiss], 55 NY2d 885; Chalmers & Sons v State of New York, 35 AD2d 864). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, the Town of East Hampton appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cromarty, J.), entered March 11, 1993, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the claimant and against it in the principal amount of $181,240, less a credit for any advance payment previously paid by the Town of East Hampton.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court’s factual determination as to the suitability of the claimant’s comparables is supported by the record and will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Phelps Dodge Indus. v Kondzielaski, 131 AD2d 675; Matter of Katz v Assessor of Vil./ Town of Mount Kisco, 82 AD2d 654; see also, Matter of City of New York [Reiss], 55 NY2d 885; Chalmers & Sons v State of New York, 35 AD2d 864). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 565, 625 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/511-equities-corp-v-town-of-east-hampton-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack