51 soc.sec.rep.ser. 139a Frances Steiner, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michael Dowling, Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services, Harold Otis Ramon Vargas Donald Miller Alfred Bulson Emmett Connally Madeline Montario Frances Hickok v. Michael Dowling, Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services

76 F.3d 498
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 1996
Docket895
StatusPublished

This text of 76 F.3d 498 (51 soc.sec.rep.ser. 139a Frances Steiner, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michael Dowling, Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services, Harold Otis Ramon Vargas Donald Miller Alfred Bulson Emmett Connally Madeline Montario Frances Hickok v. Michael Dowling, Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
51 soc.sec.rep.ser. 139a Frances Steiner, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michael Dowling, Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services, Harold Otis Ramon Vargas Donald Miller Alfred Bulson Emmett Connally Madeline Montario Frances Hickok v. Michael Dowling, Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services, 76 F.3d 498 (2d Cir. 1996).

Opinion

76 F.3d 498

51 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 139A
Frances STEINER, on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael DOWLING, Commissioner, New York State Department of
Social Services, Defendant-Appellee.
Harold OTIS; Ramon Vargas; Donald Miller; Alfred Bulson;
Emmett Connally; Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Madeline Montario; Frances Hickok, Plaintiffs,
v.
Michael DOWLING, Commissioner, New York State Department of
Social Services, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 894, 895, Dockets 95-7648(L), 95-7652.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 8, 1996.
Decided Feb. 16, 1996.

Norma E. Hogan, Albany, NY for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Darrel M. Joseph, Assistant Attorney General, Albany, NY (Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney General of the State of New York, Peter H. Schiff, Deputy Solicitor General, Peter G. Crary, Assistant Attorney General, and John McConnell, Assistant Attorney General, Albany, NY, of counsel), for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: McLAUGHLIN and CABRANES, Circuit Judges, and WEINSTEIN,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Cholakis's thorough opinion. See Steiner v. Dowling, 914 F.Supp. 25 (N.D.N.Y.1995).

*

Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steiner v. Dowling
914 F. Supp. 25 (N.D. New York, 1995)
Steiner v. Dowling
76 F.3d 498 (Second Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 F.3d 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/51-socsecrepser-139a-frances-steiner-on-behalf-of-herself-and-all-ca2-1996.