51 Fair empl.prac.cas. 458, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,473 Alva Gutierrez v. Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, Incorrectly Sued as "County of Los Angeles, a Public Entity Porter De Debovay John W. Bunnett and Russell F. Schooling, in Their Capacity as Officials Having Authority to Issue Personnel Rules for Employees of the County of Los Angeles at the Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District," Alva Gutierrez v. Porter De Debovay John W. Bunnett and Russell F. Schooling
This text of 873 F.2d 1342 (51 Fair empl.prac.cas. 458, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,473 Alva Gutierrez v. Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, Incorrectly Sued as "County of Los Angeles, a Public Entity Porter De Debovay John W. Bunnett and Russell F. Schooling, in Their Capacity as Officials Having Authority to Issue Personnel Rules for Employees of the County of Los Angeles at the Municipal Court of the Southeast Judicial District," Alva Gutierrez v. Porter De Debovay John W. Bunnett and Russell F. Schooling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
51 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 458,
52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,473
Alva GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE SOUTHEAST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES, incorrectly sued as "County of Los Angeles,
a public entity; Porter De Debovay; John W. Bunnett; and
Russell F. Schooling, in their capacity as officials having
authority to issue personnel rules for employees of the
County of Los Angeles at the Municipal Court of the
Southeast Judicial District," Defendants-Appellants.
Alva GUTIERREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Porter DE DEBOVAY; John W. Bunnett; and Russell F.
Schooling, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 85-5931, 85-6532 and 86-5888.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
May 18, 1989.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before BROWNING, TANG and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1736, 104 L.Ed.2d 174 the opinion in this case, reported at 838 F.2d 1031 (9th Cir.1988), is vacated and the appeal is dismissed as moot. The district court is instructed to dismiss its judgment. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
873 F.2d 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/51-fair-emplpraccas-458-52-empl-prac-dec-p-39473-alva-gutierrez-v-ca9-1989.