50 East 78, L.P. v. Paneth

247 A.D.2d 222, 668 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 921
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered December 4, 1996, which, insofar as appealed from, directed that in order to redeem the subject property defendants must pay plaintiff the full amount that was due under the first mortgage and not the price plaintiff paid at auction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We perceive no reasons in equity for departing from the well settled rule that junior mortgagees who were not joined in the foreclosure of a senior mortgage, and who desire to exercise their right to redemption, must pay not merely the amount bid at the auction but the amount due on the mortgage (see, 78 NY Jur 2d, Mortgages and Deeds of Trust, § 400, citing, inter alia, Benedict v Gilman, 4 Paige Ch 58; Quaremba v Nassau Suffolk Lbr. & Supply Corp., 21 Misc 2d 645, 647).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

50 East 78, L.P. v. Paneth, 247 A.D.2d 222, 668 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 222 (50 East 78, L.P. v. Paneth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bankers Trust v. Thompson
12 A.D.3d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Davis v. Cole
193 Misc. 2d 380 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)