47 Mamaroneck Avenue Corp. v. Odd Job Acquisition Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

47 Mamaroneck Avenue Corp. v. Odd Job Acquisition Corp.

265 A.D.2d 524, 696 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 524 (47 Mamaroneck Avenue Corp. v. Odd Job Acquisition Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

47 Mamaroneck Avenue Corp. v. Odd Job Acquisition Corp., 265 A.D.2d 524, 696 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[525]*525—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the commencement date of a lease, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered April 30, 1999, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on its first cause of action and granted that branch of the plaintiffs separate cross motion which was to direct them to pay rent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiff on the first cause of action (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Pursuant to the terms of the lease at issue, the defendant Odd Job Acquisition Corp. agreed that September 21, 1998, was to be the commencement date of the lease.

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Kfausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[525]*525—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the commencement date of a lease, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered April 30, 1999, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on its first cause of action and granted that branch of the plaintiffs separate cross motion which was to direct them to pay rent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiff on the first cause of action (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Pursuant to the terms of the lease at issue, the defendant Odd Job Acquisition Corp. agreed that September 21, 1998, was to be the commencement date of the lease.

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Kfausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 524, 696 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/47-mamaroneck-avenue-corp-v-odd-job-acquisition-corp-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack