450 West 31st Street Owners Corp. v. Chubb and Son, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 28, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-00705·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ──────────────────────────────────── 450 WEST 31ST STREET OWNERS CORP., ET AL., 25-cv-705 (JGK)

Plaintiffs, ORDER

- against -

CHUBB AND SON, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants. ──────────────────────────────────── JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The Court’s Order dated February 25, 2025, ECF No. 5, is vacated. On January 23, 2025, the defendants removed this case to this Court from New York State Supreme Court, New York County. ECF No. 1. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies to removed cases after the date of removal. Eccles v. Nat’l Semiconductor Corp., 10 F. Supp. 2d 514, 519 (D. Md. 1998). Thus, after removal, the plaintiffs must serve on the defendants a summons and a copy of the complaint pursuant to Rule 4(c), which requires service “within the time allowed by Rule 4(m).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1); G.G.G. Pizza, Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 67 F. Supp. 2d 99, 103 (E.D.N.Y. 1999). Rule 4(m) now requires such service “within 90 days.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Accordingly, the plaintiffs have 90 days from January 23, 2025, the date on which the defendants filed their notice of removal, to serve on the defendants a summons and a copy of the complaint. See G.G.G. Pizza, 67 F. Supp. 2d at 103. Therefore, the plaintiffs must effect such service by April 23, 2025. If the plaintiffs effect timely such service, the defendants will have 21 days to file their answer or otherwise respond to the

complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2)(A). SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2025

_____/s/ John G. Koeltl_____ John G. Koeltl United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

450 West 31st Street Owners Corp. v. Chubb and Son, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

450 West 31st Street Owners Corp. v. Chubb and Son, Inc. (450 West 31st Street Owners Corp. v. Chubb and Son, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G.G.G. Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.
67 F. Supp. 2d 99 (E.D. New York, 1999)
Eccles v. National Semiconductor Corp.
10 F. Supp. 2d 514 (D. Maryland, 1998)