Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. Boyd

437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. Boyd

124 Misc. 2d 759, 480 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1984 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3327
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 15, 1984·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Since the stipulation was entered into on the record, on the advice of counsel, and in settlement of a bona fide dispute, the “no-waiver” provisions of section 11 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (L 1974, ch 576, § 4) and section 2500.12 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations (9 NYCRR) are not applicable (see Matter of Matinzi v Joy, 60 NY2d 835; Hill v Wek Capital Corp., 4 AD2d 615; Rega v Joy, NYLJ, Aug. 25, 1982, p 11, col 1). Furthermore, the circumstances are not such as to warrant relieving tenant from the terms of the stipulation (see Hill v Wek Capital Corp., supra).

Farley, P. J., Slifkin and Geiler, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. Boyd, 124 Misc. 2d 759, 480 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1984 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

124 Misc. 2d 759 (437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arkansas Leasing Co. v. Gabriel
3 Misc. 3d 46 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Grasso v. Matarazzo
180 Misc. 2d 686 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Merwest Realty Corp. v. Prager
173 Misc. 2d 868 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1997)
Blum v. Graceton Estates, Inc.
228 A.D.2d 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Cashmere Realty Corp. v. New York City Division of Housing & Community Renewal
127 Misc. 2d 205 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)