437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. Boyd
This text of 124 Misc. 2d 759 (437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment affirmed, without costs.
Since the stipulation was entered into on the record, on the advice of counsel, and in settlement of a bona fide dispute, the “no-waiver” provisions of section 11 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (L 1974, ch 576, § 4) and section 2500.12 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations (9 NYCRR) are not applicable (see Matter of Matinzi v Joy, 60 NY2d 835; Hill v Wek Capital Corp., 4 AD2d 615; Rega v Joy, NYLJ, Aug. 25, 1982, p 11, col 1). Furthermore, the circumstances are not such as to warrant relieving tenant from the terms of the stipulation (see Hill v Wek Capital Corp., supra).
Farley, P. J., Slifkin and Geiler, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 Misc. 2d 759, 480 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1984 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/437-palisade-avenue-realty-corp-v-boyd-nyappterm-1984.