Home/Supreme Court/4278 Hazel Building Corp. v. Berest

4278 Hazel Building Corp. v. Berest

339 U.S. 961
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 29, 1950
DocketNo. 467, Misc.; No. 477, Misc.; No. 499, Misc.
StatusPublished

This text of 339 U.S. 961 (4278 Hazel Building Corp. v. Berest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
4278 Hazel Building Corp. v. Berest, 339 U.S. 961 (1950).

Opinion

[961]*961Motion for leave to file petitions for writs of certiorari denied.

Petitioners pro se in Mise. Nos. 477 and 499. Robert Marks and M. J. Myer for respondents in No. 467. Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General of New York, Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor General, and Herman N. Harcourt and George A. Radz, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent in No. 477, Mise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
339 U.S. 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/4278-hazel-building-corp-v-berest-scotus-1950.