4145 Corp. v. Brown
This text of 19 Misc. 2d 957 (4145 Corp. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a landlord notifies a tenant of decontrolled premises that if he holds over after the expiration of his lease, he will have to pay an increased rental and the tenant does continue to remain in the premises after the term expires, then the law will imply from such holding over an agreement by the tenant to accept such new terms. The fact that the tenant may have expressed his objections to such an increase will be of no avail if after the expiration of his term he continues in possession. The landlord is not precluded from seeking an increase by his acceptance of rent on account.
The final order should be modified by increasing landlord’s recovery for rent for November, 1958 to $225, together with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified affirmed, with $25 costs of this appeal to the landlord.
Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.
Final order modified, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Misc. 2d 957, 189 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/4145-corp-v-brown-nyappterm-1959.