Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/4145 Corp. v. Brown

4145 Corp. v. Brown

19 Misc. 2d 957, 189 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3505
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 11, 1959·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where a landlord notifies a tenant of decontrolled premises that if he holds over after the expiration of his lease, he will have to pay an increased rental and the tenant does continue to remain in the premises after the term expires, then the law will imply from such holding over an agreement by the tenant to accept such new terms. The fact that the tenant may have expressed his objections to such an increase will be of no avail if after the expiration of his term he continues in possession. The landlord is not precluded from seeking an increase by his acceptance of rent on account.

The final order should be modified by increasing landlord’s recovery for rent for November, 1958 to $225, together with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified affirmed, with $25 costs of this appeal to the landlord.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Final order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

4145 Corp. v. Brown, 19 Misc. 2d 957, 189 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

19 Misc. 2d 957 (4145 Corp. v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Housing Authority of East Orange v. Leff
311 A.2d 213 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
Reimer v. Kaslov
61 Misc. 2d 960 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1970)
Rita Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Seidler
40 Misc. 2d 725 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1963)
Aronson v. Markulin
39 Misc. 2d 273 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1963)
Ungar v. Schwartz
30 Misc. 2d 152 (Nassau County District Court, 1961)
Fordham Hill Associates v. Fiebach
21 Misc. 2d 277 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)