405 Monroe Co. v. Asbury Park

208 A.2d 803, 44 N.J. 322, 1965 N.J. LEXIS 232
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 19, 1965·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

Upon an earlier appeal we disposed of all issues but one, to wit, whether plaintiff had complied with the plans and specifications, and we remanded the cause to the trial court for decision upon it. 405 Monroe Co. v. Asbury Park, 40 N. J. 457, 475 (1963). The trial court resolved the matter in plaintiff’s favor and entered judgment accordingly. We certified defendant’s appeal before argument in the Appellate Division.

We find no error in the trial court’s treatment of the remaining issue described above and of subsidiary questions raised with respect to it. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Wbintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Soiiettino and Haneman—6.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

405 Monroe Co. v. Asbury Park, 208 A.2d 803, 44 N.J. 322, 1965 N.J. LEXIS 232 (N.J. 1965).

208 A.2d 803 (405 Monroe Co. v. Asbury Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Kleinberg v. Schwartz
208 A.2d 803 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)