397 West 12th Street Corp. v. Zupa

20 A.D.3d 337, 797 N.Y.S.2d 754, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7814
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in 397 West 12th Street Corp. v. Zupa. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 A.D.3d 236

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.)-, entered March 29, 2005, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment dismissing defendant’s counterclaim [338]*338seeking relief for the alleged bad faith filing by plaintiff of certain notices of pendency, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Regardless of the ultimate merit of plaintiffs claims in this action respecting the disposition of two properties, the evidence is insufficient to raise any triable issue as to whether plaintiff commenced or has prosecuted the action in bad faith (see CPLR 6514 [b]; Jonestown Place Corp. v 153 W. 33rd St. Corp., 74 AD2d 525 [1980], affd 53 NY2d 847 [1981]).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P, Saxe, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

397 West 12th Street Corp. v. Zupa, 20 A.D.3d 337, 797 N.Y.S.2d 754, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

20 A.D.3d 337 (397 West 12th Street Corp. v. Zupa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jonestown Place Corp. v. 153 West 33rd Street Corp.
422 N.E.2d 820 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)