39 Great Jones, Inc. v. Kirschner
184 Misc. 598, 54 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1759
This text of 184 Misc. 598 (39 Great Jones, Inc. v. Kirschner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
39 Great Jones, Inc. v. Kirschner, 184 Misc. 598, 54 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1759 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1945).
Opinion
The uncontradicted evidence established that the tenant was in the wholesale and not retail business. The occupancy, therefore, is within the provisions of the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1944, ch. 3).
The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of the tenant.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
184 Misc. 598, 54 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/39-great-jones-inc-v-kirschner-nysupct-1945.