34 & 7 Realopp Corp. v. Seafood City, Inc.

71 Misc. 2d 302, 335 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1876
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 22, 1972·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Guriam.

The failure to allege in the petition that ‘ ‘ the premises are not a multiple dwelling ” as required by the New York City Civil Court Rules (22 NYCRR 2900.21 [f j), is a defect [303] which can be amended by motion at any time before conclusion of the trial (Rosgro Realty Co. v. Braynen, 70 Misc 2d 808; Presta v. Circle Studios, N. Y. L. J., April 7,1972, p. 2, col. 5).

The other objections raised as to jurisdiction have no merit.

The order should be reversed with $10 costs, and motion to dismiss .the petition should be denied, matter remitted to the court below for trial of the traverse.

Concur — Streit, J. P., Qmrrn and G-old, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

34 & 7 Realopp Corp. v. Seafood City, Inc., 71 Misc. 2d 302, 335 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

71 Misc. 2d 302 (34 & 7 Realopp Corp. v. Seafood City, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tysons Associates v. Tribeca Audio Research Inc.
140 Misc. 2d 38 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1988)
Monarch Property Associates v. Benjamin
108 Misc. 2d 251 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1981)
Fitzgerald v. Washington
80 Misc. 2d 861 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Pelhut Realty Co. v. White
77 Misc. 2d 585 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)