330 Bleecker Street Corp. v. Mutual Tile Corp.

183 N.E. 381, 260 N.Y. 258, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 685
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As between the appellant, Mutual Tile Company, and the New York Title and Mortgage Company rights and priorities must obviously be ascertained and settled. Since its rights and interests are or may be involved in that settlement respondent should have an opportunity to be heard in the matter. The proper forum for the determination of all these equities and priorities is in this action. (McDermott v. Lawyers Mortgage Co., 232 N. Y. 336, 349.)

The order should be reversed, with costs in all courts, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Question No. 1 is not answered. Question No. 2 is answered in the affirmative.

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

330 Bleecker Street Corp. v. Mutual Tile Corp., 183 N.E. 381, 260 N.Y. 258, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 685 (N.Y. 1932).

183 N.E. 381 (330 Bleecker Street Corp. v. Mutual Tile Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Gateway Associates
129 A.D.2d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Sohmer v. Gedney Hills, Inc.
8 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)