33 Prospect Street Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

15 A.D.3d 492, 789 N.Y.S.2d 444, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1588
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 A.D.3d 492 (33 Prospect Street Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
33 Prospect Street Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 15 A.D.3d 492, 789 N.Y.S.2d 444, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated March 12, 2003, which modified a determination of the District Rent Administrator dated January 18, 2002, finding, in effect, that a certain apartment is subject to the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), entered November 13, 2003, which confirmed the determination and dismissed the proceeding.

[493]*493Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

By orders dated December 13, 1985, and September 23, 1988, respectively, it was determined that a certain apartment occupied by the tenant since 1961 was subject to the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974. Those proceedings were litigated by a prior owner of the building in privity with the petitioner who did not petition for further review. Collateral estoppel precludes the petitioner from seeking further review of the issue (see Bringslimark v Town of Clarkstown, 128 AD2d 663, 665 [1987]).

In any event, the determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated March 12, 2003, that the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 applied to the apartment had a rational basis and should not be disturbed (see Nine Hunts Lane Realty Corp. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 151 AD2d 465 [1989]). Florio, J.P, Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

504 11th Street Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
28 A.D.3d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.3d 492, 789 N.Y.S.2d 444, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/33-prospect-street-corp-v-new-york-state-division-of-housing-community-nyappdiv-2005.