33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1189, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,059 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Werner H. Kramarsky, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

725 F.2d 148
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1983
Docket80-7185
StatusPublished

This text of 725 F.2d 148 (33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1189, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,059 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Werner H. Kramarsky, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1189, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,059 Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Werner H. Kramarsky, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, 725 F.2d 148 (2d Cir. 1983).

Opinion

725 F.2d 148

33 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1189,
33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,059
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Werner H. KRAMARSKY, As Commissioner of the New York State
Division of Human Rights, the New York State Division of
Human Rights, and the New York State Human Rights Appeal
Board, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 19, Docket 80-7185.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Originally Argued Sept. 25, 1980.
Decided May 11, 1981.
Petition for Rehearing June 9, 1981.
Decided Nov. 24, 1981.
Remanded from the United States
Supreme Court June 24, 1983.

Decided Dec. 27, 1983.

Ann Thacher Anderson, Gen. Counsel, State Div. of Human Rights, New York City, for defendants-appellants.

Jeffrey A. Mishkin, New York City (Jeffrey D. Fields, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before KEARSE and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges, and TENNEY, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated today in our opinion in Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 725 F.2d 146, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 2890, 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983), we affirm the judgment of the district court enjoining enforcement of New York's Human Rights Law, N.Y.Exec.Law Sec. 296 (McKinney 1972 & Supp. 1980-81).

*

Honorable Charles H. Tenney, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
463 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky
725 F.2d 146 (Second Circuit, 1983)
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Kramarsky
725 F.2d 148 (Second Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
725 F.2d 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/33-fair-emplpraccas-1189-33-empl-prac-dec-p-34059-metropolitan-life-ca2-1983.