322 W. 47th St. HDFC v. Loo
92 N.E.3d 1241, 69 N.Y.S.3d 851, 30 N.Y.3d 1084
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedJanuary 16, 2018
Docket2017–1235
StatusPublished
This text of 92 N.E.3d 1241 (322 W. 47th St. HDFC v. Loo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
322 W. 47th St. HDFC v. Loo, 92 N.E.3d 1241, 69 N.Y.S.3d 851, 30 N.Y.3d 1084 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from an order entered in this proceeding commenced in *1242**852Civil Court of the City of New York (see NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b][7]; CPLR 5602[a] ). ***1085Judge Feinman took no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 N.E.3d 1241, 69 N.Y.S.3d 851, 30 N.Y.3d 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/322-w-47th-st-hdfc-v-loo-nycterr-2018.