322 W. 47th St. HDFC v. Loo
92 N.E.3d 1241, 69 N.Y.S.3d 851, 30 N.Y.3d 1084
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided January 16, 2018·No. 2017–1235·Published
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from an order entered in this proceeding commenced in *1242**852Civil Court of the City of New York (see NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b][7]; CPLR 5602[a] ). ***1085Judge Feinman took no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
322 W. 47th St. HDFC v. Loo, 92 N.E.3d 1241, 69 N.Y.S.3d 851, 30 N.Y.3d 1084 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).
92 N.E.3d 1241 (322 W. 47th St. HDFC v. Loo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.