320 W. 87, LLC v. 320 W. 87th St., Inc.

2025 NY Slip Op 30168(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedJanuary 10, 2025
DocketIndex No. 654793/2023
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 30168(U) (320 W. 87, LLC v. 320 W. 87th St., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
320 W. 87, LLC v. 320 W. 87th St., Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 30168(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

320 W. 87, LLC v 320 W. 87th St., Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 30168(U) January 10, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654793/2023 Judge: John J. Kelley Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2025 12:06 PM INDEX NO. 654793/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JOHN J. KELLEY PART IAS MOTION 56EFM Justice --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 654793/2023 320 WEST 87, LLC, MOTION DATE 09/30/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 -v- 320 WEST 87TH STREET, INC., DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION Defendant.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 35, 36, 37, 38, 41, 42, 43

were read on this motion to/for AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES .

This matter was commenced as a CPLR article 78 proceeding. In the initial petition, the

plaintiff sought an award of attorneys’ fees if it were the prevailing party. In a decision, order,

and judgment dated and entered July 30, 2024, this court converted the proceeding into an

action for declaratory relief, converted the petition into a motion for summary judgment,

redesignated the petitioner as “plaintiff” and the respondent as “defendant,” and granted the

plaintiff’s converted motion for summary judgment on the complaint. The plaintiff now moves for

an award of attorneys’ fees. The defendant opposes the motion. The motion is granted, and

the matter is referred to a referee to hear and report on the appropriate amount of the award.

In its decision, order, and judgment, the court awarded judgment to the plaintiff declaring

that it is a holder of unsold shares allocated to apartment units 1CE, 22, 4W, 4W1, 6W2, 7W,

7W1, 8W2, and 9E at 320 West 87th Street, New York, New York, and is exempt from paying a

transfer fee or “flip tax,” seeking approval from the defendant’s board of directors for each

sublease and renewal of each sublease referable to those units, paying sublet fees referable to

those units, obtaining approval from the defendant’s board of directors for apartment

renovations, except as otherwise required where building systems, such as plumbing, electricity,

INDEX NO. 654793/2023 320 WEST 87, LLC v 320 WEST 87TH STREET, INC. Page 1 of 5 SEQ 002

1 of 5 [* 1] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2025 12:06 PM INDEX NO. 654793/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2025

heating, air conditioning, and the like are involved, and complying with any other procedural

rules or restrictions applicable only to tenant-shareholders, and not applicable to holders of

unsold shares, as delineated in the applicable offering plan, proprietary lease, and/or by-laws.

The court further declared that the plaintiff is not obligated to pay so much of the defendant’s

invoice dated July 21, 2023 as purported to charge the plaintiff for a flip-tax, to charge the

plaintiff for the failure to obtain the defendant’s approval before subletting or renewing

subleases with respect to the subject apartments, to charge the plaintiff for sublet fees, or to

charge the plaintiff for failure to obtain the defendant’s approval for alteration or renovation work

in the subject apartments, except as otherwise required where building systems, such as

plumbing, electricity, heating, air conditioning, and the like are involved, and the court declared

so much of that invoice to be null and void. In addition, the court declared that the plaintiff is not

obligated to pay arrears or late charges with respect to the July 21, 2023 invoice, or any further

invoices that purported to charge or penalize it for those things, and declared that any such

invoices are null and void. Moreover, the court permanently enjoined the defendant from

issuing any such further invoices.

With respect to the issue of attorneys’ fees, however, the court noted that the plaintiff

“did not submit an affirmation of attorneys’ services or invoices supporting its claim for an award

of attorneys’ fees.” Hence, the court directed the plaintiff “if it be so advised, submit such an

affirmation and invoices within 30 days of the entry of this decision, judgment, and order, after

which the court shall determine whether an award is warranted and, if so, the extent of such an

award.” This motion ensued.

“In New York, ‘the prevailing litigant ordinarily cannot collect . . . attorneys’ fees from its

unsuccessful opponents . . . . Attorneys' fees are treated as incidents of litigation, rather than

damages . . . . The exception is when an award is authorized by agreement between the parties

or by statute or court rule’” (Ambac Assur. Corp. v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 31 NY3d

569, 584 [2018], quoting Congel v Malfitano, 31 NY3d 272, 290-291 [2018] [citations and

INDEX NO. 654793/2023 320 WEST 87, LLC v 320 WEST 87TH STREET, INC. Page 2 of 5 SEQ 002

2 of 5 [* 2] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/13/2025 12:06 PM INDEX NO. 654793/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2025

internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, the subject proprietary lease in fact provides for the

award of reasonable attorneys’ fees to the defendant if it prevailed in any action arising from the

purported default of a tenant under the terms thereof. Real Property Law § 234 provides a

tenant with an implied reciprocal right to recover attorneys' fees “incurred . . . as the result of the

failure of the landlord to perform any covenant or agreement . . . under the lease.” This statute

applies to proprietary leases issued by a cooperative apartment corporation (see Estate of Del

Terzo v 33 Fifth Ave. Owners Corp., 136 AD3d 486, 489-491 [1st Dept 2016], affd 28 NY3d

1114 [2016]). The court concludes that the defendant here, by invoicing the plaintiff improperly

and demanding that it be entitled to withhold consent to, and charging the plaintiff for, subletting

the subject apartments, among other things, failed to perform covenants and agreements under

the lease. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and

disbursements.

Accordingly, it is,

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion is granted, and the plaintiff is awarded its

reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements incurred in prosecuting this action; and it is

further,

ORDERED that a Judicial Hearing Officer (JHO) or Special Referee shall be designated

to hear and report to this court on the following individual issues of fact, which are hereby

submitted to the JHO/Special Referee for such purpose: the proper amount of attorneys’ fees

and disbursements to be awarded to the plaintiff; and it is further,

ORDERED that this matter is hereby referred to the Special Referee Clerk (Room 119M,

646-386-3028 or spref@nycourts.gov) for placement at the earliest possible date upon which

the calendar of the Special Referees Part (Part SRP), which, in accordance with the Rules of

that Part (which are posted on the website of this court at www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh at the

“References” link under “Courthouse Procedures”), shall assign this matter to an available

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Del Terzo v. 33 Fifth Avenue Owners Corp.
136 A.D.3d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Congel v. Malfitano
101 N.E.3d 341 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)
Ambac Assur. Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
31 N.Y.3d 569 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 30168(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/320-w-87-llc-v-320-w-87th-st-inc-nysupctnewyork-2025.