3031 INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Ocean Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

3031 INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Ocean Bank

23 So. 3d 238, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19622, 2009 WL 4824776

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 16, 2009

Docket3D09-2362

StatusPublished

This text of 23 So. 3d 238 (3031 INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Ocean Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

3031 INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Ocean Bank, 23 So. 3d 238, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19622, 2009 WL 4824776 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*239 SHEPHERD, J.

Affirmed. See KeyBank Nat’l Ass’n v. Knuth Ltd., 15 So.3d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Ateo Constr. & Dev. Corp. v. Beneficial Sav. Bank, 523 So.2d 747, 750 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (“[A] court of equity should appoint a receiver unless the mortgagor makes it clear that the real property covered by the mortgage will sell for enough to pay the debt and charges due the mortgagee and thus affords ample and entirely adequate security.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*239 SHEPHERD, J.

Affirmed. See KeyBank Nat’l Ass’n v. Knuth Ltd., 15 So.3d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Ateo Constr. & Dev. Corp. v. Beneficial Sav. Bank, 523 So.2d 747, 750 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (“[A] court of equity should appoint a receiver unless the mortgagor makes it clear that the real property covered by the mortgage will sell for enough to pay the debt and charges due the mortgagee and thus affords ample and entirely adequate security.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 So. 3d 238, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19622, 2009 WL 4824776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/3031-investment-corporation-v-ocean-bank-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack