3031 INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Ocean Bank
23 So. 3d 238, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19622, 2009 WL 4824776
Opinion
Affirmed. See KeyBank Nat’l Ass’n v. Knuth Ltd., 15 So.3d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Ateo Constr. & Dev. Corp. v. Beneficial Sav. Bank, 523 So.2d 747, 750 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (“[A] court of equity should appoint a receiver unless the mortgagor makes it clear that the real property covered by the mortgage will sell for enough to pay the debt and charges due the mortgagee and thus affords ample and entirely adequate security.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
3031 INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Ocean Bank, 23 So. 3d 238, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19622, 2009 WL 4824776 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
23 So. 3d 238 (3031 INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Ocean Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ATCO CONST. & DEV. CORP. v. Beneficial Sav. Bank
523 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Keybank National Ass'n v. Knuth Ltd.
15 So. 3d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)