3 E. 52nd St. Corp. v. Uris Fifth Avenue Corp.

39 A.D.2d 529, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4951
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in 3 E. 52nd St. Corp. v. Uris Fifth Avenue Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 A.D.2d 917

Opinion

Motion for reargument and for modification granted to the following extent. The plaintiffs, in the exercise of discretion and in the interests of justice, shall be granted a preference upon the fifing of a proper note of issue and the payment of neces[530]*530sary fees. Excerpts from affidavits not hitherto available indicate that defendant has taken the position that the blasting operations caused some damage to plaintiffs’ properties. (Sullivan v. Ganios, 31 A D 2d 527; Rasner v. Golden Skillet of N. Y.; 33 A D 2d 679; Matter of Smith v. Hirsch, 34 A D 2d 629.) The provision for costs is stricken and a provision for costs to abide the event substituted therefor. In view of the foregoing, that portion of the motion seeking leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied. Concur — Kupf erman, J. P., Murphy, McNally, iSteuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

3 E. 52nd St. Corp. v. Uris Fifth Avenue Corp., 39 A.D.2d 529, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

39 A.D.2d 529 (3 E. 52nd St. Corp. v. Uris Fifth Avenue Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.