2922 Sherman Avenue Tenants' Ass'n v. Serafin

36 F. App'x 457
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 2002
DocketNo. 01-7105
StatusPublished

This text of 36 F. App'x 457 (2922 Sherman Avenue Tenants' Ass'n v. Serafin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
2922 Sherman Avenue Tenants' Ass'n v. Serafin, 36 F. App'x 457 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. RApp. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment be affirmed. Appellant’s third party complaint was not so related to the federal cause of action that it forms the same case or controversy. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367; United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725, 86 S.Ct. 1130, 16 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
383 U.S. 715 (Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 F. App'x 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/2922-sherman-avenue-tenants-assn-v-serafin-cadc-2002.