2776 Blvd. LLC v. SME Capital Ventures

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 2016
Docket2016 NYSlipOp 51385(U)
StatusPublished

This text of 2776 Blvd. LLC v. SME Capital Ventures (2776 Blvd. LLC v. SME Capital Ventures) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
2776 Blvd. LLC v. SME Capital Ventures, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion



2776 Boulevard LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant,

against

SME Capital Ventures, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent.


Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jack Stoller, J.), dated August 12, 2015, which awarded tenant attorneys' fees in the principal sum of $12,621 in a holdover summary proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Order (Jack Stoller, J.), dated August 12, 2015, modified to reduce tenant's recovery of attorneys' fees to the principal sum of $10,000; as modified, order affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as landlord failed to pursue a direct appeal from the orders of May 4, 2015 and May 15, 2015, which, respectively, dismissed the holdover petition and determined that tenant was entitled to attorneys' fees as the prevailing party, landlord's present challenge to those orders is not properly before us (see Hecht v City of New York, 60 NY2d 57, 61 [1983]; Osorio v Kenart Realty, Inc., 48 AD3d 650, 653-654 [2008]).

Viewing the evidence presented in light of all relevant factors (see Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, 9 [1974]), including the time and labor required, the difficulty of the questions involved, and the lawyer's experience ability and reputation, we find the amount of the fees awarded below was excessive to the extent indicated. In so concluding, we adopt the court's stated view that counsel's expenditures of time were somewhat "excessive" and "duplicative."

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur
Decision Date: September 30, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.
311 N.E.2d 480 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Hecht v. City of New York
454 N.E.2d 527 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Osorio v. Kenart Realty, Inc.
48 A.D.3d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2776 Blvd. LLC v. SME Capital Ventures, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/2776-blvd-llc-v-sme-capital-ventures-nyappterm-2016.