25th Realty Associates v. Griggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

25th Realty Associates v. Griggs

195 A.D.2d 428, 602 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7605

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 29, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 195 A.D.2d 428 (25th Realty Associates v. Griggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

25th Realty Associates v. Griggs, 195 A.D.2d 428, 602 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), dated September 16, 1992 and entered September 29, 1992 and an order, same court and Justice entered October 30, 1992 unanimously modified on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to provide that (1) All past arrears, including any sums applicable to the current month, are to be paid within twenty (20) days of the entry of this order; (2) All future rents are to be paid by the 10th day of each month; (3) Defendant, Dennis Griggs, may [429]*429not resume occupancy or residence, temporary or otherwise, unless authorized in writing to do so by the landlord; and (4) The failure to meet any of the above conditions shall be deemed a substantial violation of the terms of the wife’s and children’s tenancy, and shall constitute the basis for renewal in this action, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Under the facts of this case, we find no abuse of discretion and we modify the orders only to the extent indicated. Concur —Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), dated September 16, 1992 and entered September 29, 1992 and an order, same court and Justice entered October 30, 1992 unanimously modified on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to provide that (1) All past arrears, including any sums applicable to the current month, are to be paid within twenty (20) days of the entry of this order; (2) All future rents are to be paid by the 10th day of each month; (3) Defendant, Dennis Griggs, may [429]*429not resume occupancy or residence, temporary or otherwise, unless authorized in writing to do so by the landlord; and (4) The failure to meet any of the above conditions shall be deemed a substantial violation of the terms of the wife’s and children’s tenancy, and shall constitute the basis for renewal in this action, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Under the facts of this case, we find no abuse of discretion and we modify the orders only to the extent indicated. Concur —Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 A.D.2d 428, 602 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/25th-realty-associates-v-griggs-nyappdiv-1993.