2564 Co. v. D'Addario

35 Misc. 2d 176, 232 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1983
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 30, 1961·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that the tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 11 separate dispossess proceedings over a period from October, 1958 to May, 1960, or one every three months, a final order in favor of the landlord should, have been granted (Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N. Y. S. 2d 888; 974 Realty Corp.v. Ledford, 9 Misc 2d 240; Rental Realty Corp. v. Lawrence,. 14 Misc 2d 1070).

[177] The final order in favor of tenant should he reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs.

Concur — IIofstadter, J. P., Tilzer and Gold, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

2564 Co. v. D'Addario, 35 Misc. 2d 176, 232 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

35 Misc. 2d 176 (2564 Co. v. D'Addario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Shoes, Inc. v. Annex Camera & Electronics, Inc.
114 Misc. 2d 751 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1982)