244-250 East 74 Associates, Inc. v. Meissner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

244-250 East 74 Associates, Inc. v. Meissner

194 A.D.2d 477, 599 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6761

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 194 A.D.2d 477 (244-250 East 74 Associates, Inc. v. Meissner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

244-250 East 74 Associates, Inc. v. Meissner, 194 A.D.2d 477, 599 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered May 8, 1992, which granted petitioner’s Judiciary Law § 475 petition to enforce an attorney’s lien, and awarded him the total amount of $24,819.50, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court correctly concluded that plaintiffs failure to raise a triable issue of fact precluded the necessity for a hearing. The record conclusively rebuts the four defenses raised by plaintiff client, including an unsupported charge of professional malpractice and a purported conflict of interest by petitioner in the course of his successful representation. The other objections to payment are also without merit. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered May 8, 1992, which granted petitioner’s Judiciary Law § 475 petition to enforce an attorney’s lien, and awarded him the total amount of $24,819.50, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court correctly concluded that plaintiffs failure to raise a triable issue of fact precluded the necessity for a hearing. The record conclusively rebuts the four defenses raised by plaintiff client, including an unsupported charge of professional malpractice and a purported conflict of interest by petitioner in the course of his successful representation. The other objections to payment are also without merit. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 477, 599 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/244-250-east-74-associates-inc-v-meissner-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack