242 Tenth Invs. LP v. GVC 242 Tenth Sponsor, LLC
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 32360(U) (242 Tenth Invs. LP v. GVC 242 Tenth Sponsor, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
242 Tenth Invs. LP v GVC 242 Tenth Sponsor, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 32360(U) July 10, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No.: 651242/2021 Judge: Joel M. Cohen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 651242/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 366 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/10/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION PART 03M -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X 242 TENTH INVESTORS LP, INDEX NO. 651242/2021
Plaintiff, MOTION DATE 05/03/2024 -v- MOTION SEQ. NO. 011 GVC 242 TENTH SPONSOR, LLC, GVC 242 TENTH SPONSOR INV LLC DECISION + ORDER ON Defendants. MOTION -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
HON. JOEL M. COHEN:
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 011) 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352 were read on this motion to SEAL .
Defendants GVC 242 Tenth Sponsor, LLC and GVC 242 Tenth Sponsor Inv LLC
(collectively, “Defendants”) moves for an order sealing and/or redacting certain sealing certain
documents (NYSCEF 212, 233, 294, 297, 308 and 343) filed in connection with the parties’
motions for summary judgment. No parties have opposed this motion. For the following
reasons, the motion is granted.
Pursuant to § 216.1 (a) of the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts, this Court may seal a filing
“upon a written finding of good cause, which shall specify the grounds thereof. In determining
whether good cause has been shown, the court shall consider the interests of the public as well as
of the parties” (22 NYCRR § 216.1 [a]).
The Appellate Division has emphasized that “there is a broad presumption that the public
is entitled to access to judicial proceedings and court records” (Mosallem v Berenson, 76 AD3d
345, 348 [1st Dept 2010]). “Since the right [of public access to court proceedings] is of
651242/2021 242 TENTH INVESTORS LP vs. GVC 242 TENTH SPONSOR, LLC Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 011
1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 651242/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 366 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/10/2024
constitutional dimension, any order denying access must be narrowly tailored to serve
compelling objectives, such as a need for secrecy that outweighs the public’s right to access”
(Danco Labs., Ltd. v Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd., 274 AD2d 1, 6 [1st Dept 2000]
[emphasis added]; see also, e.g. Gryphon Dom. VI, LLC v APP Intern. Fin. Co., B.V., 28 AD3d
322, 324 [1st Dept 2006]). “Furthermore, because confidentiality is the exception and not the
rule, ‘the party seeking to seal court records has the burden to demonstrate compelling
circumstances to justify restricting public access’” (Maxim, Inc. v Feifer, 145 AD3d 516, 517
[1st Dept 2016] [citations omitted]).
The Court has reviewed the documents subject to this motion and finds the following:
First, Defendants may file of a redacted version of Plaintiff’s memorandum of law in
opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (NYSCEF 343), with the redactions set
forth in NYSCEF 350, as the same subject matter was previously approved by the Court for
redaction in the Decision and Order on Mot. Seq. 007 (NYSCEF 146).
Similarly, Exhibit A (NYSCEF 294 [“Email dated July 3, 2019”]), Exhibit D (NYSCEF
212, 297 [“Email dated October 28, 2019”]), and Exhibit O (NYSCEF 233, 308 [“Email dated
March 9, 2020”]) to the Affirmation of Jonathan E. Temchin in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion
for summary judgment (NYSCEF 293 [“Temchin Affirmation”]) may be publicly filed with the
redactions identified in NYSCEF 347, 348, and 349, respectively, as they contain non-public
information regarding the parties’ internal deliberations on the partnership’s deregulation
strategy. The redactions are targeted and satisfy the requirements of 22 NYCRR § 216.1 (a).
Accordingly, it is:
ORDERED that the Motion to Seal and/or Redact is GRANTED; it is further
651242/2021 242 TENTH INVESTORS LP vs. GVC 242 TENTH SPONSOR, LLC Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 011
2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 651242/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 366 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/10/2024
ORDERED that the County Clerk is directed, upon service of a copy of this order with
notice of entry, (1) to maintain NYSCEF Document Numbers 212, 233, 294, 297, 308 and 343
under seal, so that the documents may only be accessible by the parties, their counsel, and
authorized court personnel; and (2) to maintain NYSCEF Document Numbers 347, 348, 349, and
350 in their current redacted form; it is further
ORDERED that within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, the parties are directed
to submit a list of any documents filed with a request to seal on NYSCEF but were not made a
part of any sealing motion; the County Clerk is directed, upon service of such list, to unseal those
documents; it is further
ORDERED as it related to future submissions, made by any party, that contain subject
matter that the Court has authorized to be sealed by this Order, parties may file a joint
stipulation, to be So Ordered, which will authorize the filing of such future submissions to be
filed in redacted form on NYSCEF, provided that an unredacted copy of any redacted document
is contemporaneously filed under seal; and it is further
ORDERED that service upon the County Clerk shall be made in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for
Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the “E-Filing” page on the court’s website)]; and it is
further
ORDERED that nothing in this Order shall be construed as authorizing the sealing or
redactions of any documents or evidence to be offered at trial.
651242/2021 242 TENTH INVESTORS LP vs. GVC 242 TENTH SPONSOR, LLC Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 011
3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 651242/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 366 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/10/2024
7/10/2024 DATE JOEL M. COHEN, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED X NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
X GRANTED DENIED GRANTED IN PART OTHER
APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE
651242/2021 242 TENTH INVESTORS LP vs. GVC 242 TENTH SPONSOR, LLC Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 011
4 of 4 [* 4]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 32360(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/242-tenth-invs-lp-v-gvc-242-tenth-sponsor-llc-nysupctnewyork-2024.