241 East 22nd Street Corp. v. City Rent Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

241 East 22nd Street Corp. v. City Rent Agency

42 A.D.2d 695, 346 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 695 (241 East 22nd Street Corp. v. City Rent Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

241 East 22nd Street Corp. v. City Rent Agency, 42 A.D.2d 695, 346 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Hew York County, entered May 4, 1973, dismissing a petition to compel respondent City Rent Agency to process certain applications for net annual return (hardship) adjustments in accordance with the Rent Regulations in effect prior to the adoption of Amendment 33 to said regulations, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and vacated, the application granted and respondent City Rent Agency directed to process said applications. This [696]*696is. a companion appeal to Matter of Kerr v. Urstadt (42 A D 2d 694), decided simultaneously herewith. Since we have determined on the related appeal that Amendment 33 to the City’s Rent Regulations is invalid, petitioners are now entitled to the relief sought herein. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Hew York County, entered May 4, 1973, dismissing a petition to compel respondent City Rent Agency to process certain applications for net annual return (hardship) adjustments in accordance with the Rent Regulations in effect prior to the adoption of Amendment 33 to said regulations, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and vacated, the application granted and respondent City Rent Agency directed to process said applications. This [696]*696is. a companion appeal to Matter of Kerr v. Urstadt (42 A D 2d 694), decided simultaneously herewith. Since we have determined on the related appeal that Amendment 33 to the City’s Rent Regulations is invalid, petitioners are now entitled to the relief sought herein. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 695, 346 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/241-east-22nd-street-corp-v-city-rent-agency-nyappdiv-1973.