235 West 71 Street LLC v. Chechak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

235 West 71 Street LLC v. Chechak

16 A.D.3d 242, 790 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2995

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 A.D.3d 242 (235 West 71 Street LLC v. Chechak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

235 West 71 Street LLC v. Chechak, 16 A.D.3d 242, 790 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2995 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered June 22, 2004, which affirmed an order of Civil Court, New York County (Dawn M. Jimenez, J.), entered on or about July 11, 2003, granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment and denying petitioner’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner failed to come forward with evidence of an unlawful assignment in opposition to respondents’ factual showing on their motion. The only evidence proffered by petitioner was that the apartment may not be tenant Erik Chechak’s primary residence. The proper procedure for terminating this tenancy was not initiated. The petition was thus properly dismissed (see PLWJ Realty v Gonzalez, 285 AD2d 370 [2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 676 [2001]). Concur — Buckley, P.J., Marlow, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered June 22, 2004, which affirmed an order of Civil Court, New York County (Dawn M. Jimenez, J.), entered on or about July 11, 2003, granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment and denying petitioner’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner failed to come forward with evidence of an unlawful assignment in opposition to respondents’ factual showing on their motion. The only evidence proffered by petitioner was that the apartment may not be tenant Erik Chechak’s primary residence. The proper procedure for terminating this tenancy was not initiated. The petition was thus properly dismissed (see PLWJ Realty v Gonzalez, 285 AD2d 370 [2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 676 [2001]). Concur — Buckley, P.J., Marlow, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 242, 790 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/235-west-71-street-llc-v-chechak-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack