2330 Ocean Assoc. LLC v. Haroun

2021 NY Slip Op 34052
CourtNew York Supreme Court, Rockland County
DecidedJuly 8, 2021
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 34052 (2330 Ocean Assoc. LLC v. Haroun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, Rockland County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
2330 Ocean Assoc. LLC v. Haroun, 2021 NY Slip Op 34052 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2021).

Opinion

2330 Ocean Assoc. LLC v Haroun 2021 NY Slip Op 34052(U) July 8, 2021 Supreme Court, Rockland County Docket Number: Index No. 030045/2021 E Judge: Rolf M. Thorsen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: ROCKLAND COUNTY CLERK 07/08/2021 05:27 PM INDEX NO. 030045/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/08/2021

SUPREME SUPREME COURT: STATE STATE OF NEW YORK OF NEW YORK COUNTY COUNTY OF ROCKLAND ROCKLAND ------------------------------------x ------------------------------------X To commence commence the statutory for appeals statutory time appeals as of right period time period right (CPLR_ (CPLR. 5513[a])~ you are advised 5513[aJ), you advised to serve a serve a 2330 OCEAN ASSOCIATES LLC, OCEAN ASSOCIATES copy copy of this this order, with with notice notice of entry, upon upon all parties. parties. Plaintiff, Plaintiff, DECISION & DECISION & ORDER ORDER -against- -against- Index Index No: 030045/2021 030045/2021 E FARIDA HAROUN, FARIDA

Defendant. Defendant. ------------------------------------x ------------------------------------X

HON. ROLF HON. ROLF M. M. THORSEN, A.J.S.C. THORSEN, A.J.S.C.

In the wiwithin thin action action for, for, inter inter alia, breach breach of contract contract seeking seeking monetary monetary damages damages for property property damage damage allegedly allegedly caused caused by Defendant/Tenant, Defendant, Farida Haroun moves Defendant/Tenant, Defendant, Farida Haroun moves for the following following relief: (1) (1) an order, pursuant pursuant to CPLR CPLR §32ll{a) S3211{a) (7), (7), dismissing dismissing the complaint complaint for the failure failure to establish establish the condition precedent for condition precedent the commencement commencement of the action action and to set forthforth sufficient sufficient facts establishing establishing its claim claim for intentional intentional interference interference withwith business business relations, and, alternatively, relations, alternatively, (2)(2) an order order transferring transferring the action action to Kings County County Supreme Supreme Court pursuant pursuant to CPLR CPLR §510 S510 in the interests interests of justice justice and because because of the location location of the witnesses. witnesses. The Court Court has considered considered the following papers on the motion: following papers motion:

1. 1. Notice of Motion, Notice Motion, Affidavit Affidavit in Support Support and Exhibits Exhibits AA through E through E· attached thereto and Affidavits attached thereto Affidavits of Facts; 2. 2. Affidavits in Opposition Affidavits Opposition and Affirmation Affirmation in Opposition; Opposition; 3. 3. Affidavit in Reply; Affidavit 4. 4. Notice of Rejection Notice Rejection of Reply Affidavit; and Reply Affidavit; 5. 5. Memorandum of Law in Reply. Memorandum

Plaintiff landlord Plaintiff landlord commenced commenced the present present action t_o recover action to recover monetary damages monetary damages from Defendant/Tenant. Defendant/Tenant. Plaintiff alleges Plaintiff alleges the following following facts in the complaint: complaint: The subject subject apartment leased to apartment leased Defendant, located located in Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York, was iri excellent physical in excellent physical condition. condi tion. Defendant Defendant caused caused substantial physical damage substantial physical damage to the apartment. apartment. No construction work in the apartment construction work necessary, apartment was necessary,

1 of 6 [* 1] Page -1- FILED: ROCKLAND COUNTY CLERK 07/08/2021 05:27 PM INDEX NO. 030045/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/08/2021

permitted. requested, nor permitted. requested, Defendant had an obligation Defendant under the obligation under reasonable condition and apartment in aa reasonable maintain the apartment lease to maintain condition Defendant breached Defendant Defendant has deliberately obligation. Defendant breached that obligation. deliberately caused caused damage apartment, reported damage to the apartment, City damage to City reported the damage agencies as "violations," agencies "violations," which Plaintiff must which Plaintiff now defend, and must now refused to allow refused Plaintiff into the apartment allow Plpintiff apartment to make repairs in make repairs violations. order to cure the violations. order Defendant apparently Defendant intended to apparently intended interfere interfere with business and use of the apartment. Plaintiff's business with Plaintiff's apartment.

Plaintiff alleges Plaintiff three causes alleges three complaint. In action in the complaint. causes of action Plaintiff seeks monetary cause of action, Plaintiff the first cause damages in the monetary damages sum of $150,000.00, $150,000.00, plus punitive damages plus punitive damages for intentional intentional interference interference with business relations. with business relations. In the second cause of second cause Plaintiff seeks $50,000.00 action, Plaintiff seeks $50,000.00 for property property damages. damages. Finally, in the third cause of action, Plaintiff third cause alleges Defendant Plaintiff alleges breached Defendant breached his duty maintain the subject duty to maintain subject apartment condition and good condition apartment in good damages in excess seeks damages $50,000.00. excess of $50,000.00.

In lieu of an answer, Defendant filed the present answer, Defendant motion present motion seeking seeking to dismiss complaint and, dismiss the complaint alternatively, and, al ternati vely, for the transfer of the action transfer County Supreme action to Kings County Supreme Court.

affidavit in support In her affidavit motion, Defendant support of the motion, Defendant alleges, inter inter alia, the following: following: A A few days prior prior to moving into the moving subject apartment subject August 2020, she was advised apartment in August advised that landlord that the landlord had not started started repairs promised, including apartment, as promised, repairs in the apartment, including painting the apartment, painting repairing a apartment, repairing bedroom floor, flood-damaged bedroom a flood-damaged removing wood and removing paneling. Since wood paneling. given a Since she had given deposit on the a deposit apartment and had apartment had given 30-day notice given 30-day prior landlord, notice to her prior landlord, she moved apartment and accepted moved into the apartment accepted a $2,250.00 in credit of $2,250.00 a rent credit making a exchange for making exchange a limited limited number repairs, including number of repairs, removing including removing some of the woodwood paneling, hiring a paneling, hiring installing aa new painter, and installing a painter, floor surface surface in the smaller smaller bedroom. mid-September, the bedroom. In mid-September, landlord hired a landlord hired replace a plumber to replace a plumber broken pipe section of broken a section under pipe under containing the flood damage, and the plumber bedroom floor containing the bedroom plumber left two significant significant holes bathroom floors, bedroom and bathroom holes in the bedroom subflooring and joists, and through subflooring basement ceiling. through the basement ceiling. After After neither the plumber neither superintendent of the apartment plumber nor superintendent building apartment building would would commit commit to repairing repairing the holes, Defendant Defendant and and her partner partner reported holes to New York City.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

235 W 71 Units LLC v. Zeballos
127 A.D.3d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
200 East 27th LLC v. Schiffmiller-Nachshen
8 Misc. 3d 345 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)
Unicorn 151 Corp. v. Small
181 Misc. 2d 304 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 34052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/2330-ocean-assoc-llc-v-haroun-nysupctrcklnd-2021.