230 East 44th Street Associates, LLC v. Park on 44th Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

230 East 44th Street Associates, LLC v. Park on 44th Corp.

93 A.D.3d 446, 939 N.Y.S.2d 696

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.D.3d 446 (230 East 44th Street Associates, LLC v. Park on 44th Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

230 East 44th Street Associates, LLC v. Park on 44th Corp., 93 A.D.3d 446, 939 N.Y.S.2d 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J), entered February 9, 2011, awarding plaintiff attorney’s fees as against defendant Park on 44th Corp., and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered September 2, 2010, which denied said defendant’s motion to vacate an order granting a default judgment, and an order, same court (Lance B. Hewitt, Special Ref.), entered February 8, 2011, which directed an award of attorney’s fees, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the judgment vacated, and the motion granted. Appeals from the aforesaid orders unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The motion court should have vacated the default judgment. Defendant proffered a sufficient excuse for its default and demonstrated a meritorious defense. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J), entered February 9, 2011, awarding plaintiff attorney’s fees as against defendant Park on 44th Corp., and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered September 2, 2010, which denied said defendant’s motion to vacate an order granting a default judgment, and an order, same court (Lance B. Hewitt, Special Ref.), entered February 8, 2011, which directed an award of attorney’s fees, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the judgment vacated, and the motion granted. Appeals from the aforesaid orders unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The motion court should have vacated the default judgment. Defendant proffered a sufficient excuse for its default and demonstrated a meritorious defense. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.3d 446, 939 N.Y.S.2d 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/230-east-44th-street-associates-llc-v-park-on-44th-corp-nyappdiv-2012.