2275 West Corp. v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

2275 West Corp. v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.

857 So. 2d 298, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14383, 2003 WL 22193318

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 24, 2003

DocketNos. 3D03-1362, 3D03-1256

StatusPublished

This text of 857 So. 2d 298 (2275 West Corp. v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

2275 West Corp. v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co., 857 So. 2d 298, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14383, 2003 WL 22193318 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this foreclosure action, 2275 West Corporation [West] appeals (1) an order granting American Bankers Life Assurance Company’s emergency motion for sequestration of rents, and (2) a subsequent order denying a motion to vacate the sequestration order. West also seeks a writ of prohibition in connection with the denial of its motion for disqualification of the trial judge.

We find no significant procedural or substantive error in the trial court’s rulings on the motion for sequestration of rents. We, therefore, affirm the orders appealed.

Similarly, because we find no basis for judicial disqualification in this case, we deny the petition for writ of prohibition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this foreclosure action, 2275 West Corporation [West] appeals (1) an order granting American Bankers Life Assurance Company’s emergency motion for sequestration of rents, and (2) a subsequent order denying a motion to vacate the sequestration order. West also seeks a writ of prohibition in connection with the denial of its motion for disqualification of the trial judge.

We find no significant procedural or substantive error in the trial court’s rulings on the motion for sequestration of rents. We, therefore, affirm the orders appealed.

Similarly, because we find no basis for judicial disqualification in this case, we deny the petition for writ of prohibition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

857 So. 2d 298, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14383, 2003 WL 22193318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/2275-west-corp-v-american-bankers-life-assurance-co-fladistctapp-2003.