220 East 56th Street Corp. v. Excelsior Savings Bank

253 A.D. 345, 2 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8436
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 18, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 253 A.D. 345 (220 East 56th Street Corp. v. Excelsior Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
220 East 56th Street Corp. v. Excelsior Savings Bank, 253 A.D. 345, 2 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, in its complaint, demanded relief of an equitable nature, including the restitution to it of certain real property which it formerly possessed as tenant, and for money damages for the alleged unlawful ouster from said property. The court at Special Term dismissed the complaint, on the ground that a final order of dispossess, made by the Municipal Court in favor of the present defendant bank, in a hold-over proceeding in which said defendant was landlord and this plaintiff a tenant, was res adjudicata. The final order relied on has since been reversed, and an order made for the restitution of the premises. (Excelsior Savings Bank v. 220 East 56th Street Corporation, App. Term, First Dept., Dec. 16, 1937, N. Y. L. J. Dec. 17, 1937, p. 2228; motion for leave to appeal denied, App. Div., First Dept., Feb. 4. 1938, N. Y. L. J. Feb. 5, 1938, n. 612.)

[346]*346Because of the order of restitution, plaintiff may not require all the relief demanded in the present complaint, but it is entitled to continue this action as to some of the relief sought. The action having been properly brought in equity at the time of its commencement, the filing of a lis pendens was proper. In any event, the court below improperly canceled the lis pendens before the time to appeal had expired. - (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 123.)

Under the circumstances the order and judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied.

Present- — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawlor v. 543 Second Avenue LLC
49 A.D.3d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Nadeau v. Tuley
160 A.D.2d 1130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Pix Furniture, Inc. v. Loew's Theatres & Realty Corp.
131 Misc. 2d 517 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
Schlegel v. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n
38 Misc. 2d 268 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Gross v. Castleton Housing Corp.
271 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 345, 2 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/220-east-56th-street-corp-v-excelsior-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1938.