220-2 East 85th St., Inc. v. Fastenberg

13 A.D.2d 724, 214 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11154

This text of 13 A.D.2d 724 (220-2 East 85th St., Inc. v. Fastenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
220-2 East 85th St., Inc. v. Fastenberg, 13 A.D.2d 724, 214 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the action remanded to Special Term to make findings as to the disputed factual issues. The findings of the court do not adequately comply with section 440 of the Civil Practice Act, which requires the decision of the court to state the essential facts. (Hurwitz v. Hurwitz, 3 A D 2d 1009; Steel Co. of So. Cal. v. Associated Metals & Mins. Corp., 277 App. Div. 687; Mason v. Lory Dress Co., 277 App. Div. 660.) Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.2d 724, 214 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/220-2-east-85th-st-inc-v-fastenberg-nyappdiv-1961.