21st Mortgage Corp. v. Rodriguez-Cardona

153 A.D.3d 1383, 60 N.Y.S.3d 697

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baily-Schiffman, J.), dated March 13, 2015, as granted the motion of the defendant Jose Luis Rodriguez-Cardona pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him as time-barred.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs to the appellant, in light of our decision and order in Option One Mtge. v Rodriguez-Cardona (153 AD3d 1422 [2017] [decided herewith]).

Our reinstatement of the complaint in Option One Mtge. v Rodriguez-Cardona (153 AD3d 1422 [2017] [decided herewith]), along with the substitution of the plaintiff as the named plaintiff therein, renders this appeal academic (see RPAPL 1301 [3]; Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v Reid, 132 AD3d 788 [2015]).

Chambers, J.P., Miller, Barros and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21st Mortgage Corp. v. Rodriguez-Cardona, 153 A.D.3d 1383, 60 N.Y.S.3d 697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

153 A.D.3d 1383 (21st Mortgage Corp. v. Rodriguez-Cardona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Reid
132 A.D.3d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Option One Mortgage v. Rodriguez-Cardona
2017 NY Slip Op 6656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)