217 Front Street Metals & Rubber Corp. v. Klug

143 Misc. 164, 256 N.Y.S. 48, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1419
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 143 Misc. 164 (217 Front Street Metals & Rubber Corp. v. Klug) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
217 Front Street Metals & Rubber Corp. v. Klug, 143 Misc. 164, 256 N.Y.S. 48, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case a marshal attempted to make a levy as upon judgment entered, and to. bring the motion within the scope of subdivision 4 of section 154 of the Municipal Court Code, so as to make the order below appealable, defendant was not required to await the actual entry of judgment before moving to open his alleged default.

The provision in subdivision 2 of section 129 of the statute that upon granting a motion to open a default and to vacate a judgment entered thereon “ the court must set the case down for trial is inapplicable to this case, wherein issue had not been joined and no facts tending to show the propriety of setting the case down for trial are presented.

Order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP v. AVRA Surgical Robotics, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 06171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 Misc. 164, 256 N.Y.S. 48, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/217-front-street-metals-rubber-corp-v-klug-nyappterm-1932.