210 East 68th Street Corp. v. City Rent Agency

New York Court of Appeals

210 East 68th Street Corp. v. City Rent Agency

309 N.E.2d 877, 34 N.Y.2d 552, 354 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1792

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 21, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 N.E.2d 877 (210 East 68th Street Corp. v. City Rent Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

210 East 68th Street Corp. v. City Rent Agency, 309 N.E.2d 877, 34 N.Y.2d 552, 354 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1792 (N.Y. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Motions by (A) Robert Abrams, President of the Borough of the Bronx, for leave to file a brief amicus curiae and (B) by Paul O’Dwyer and others as listed in the notice of motion herein for leave to file a brief amici curiae and to participate in the oral argument of the appeal herein denied upon the ground that there is no showing in the motion papers that appellants are not capable of a full and adequate presentation and that movants could remedy the deficiency, that movants would invite the . court’s attention to law or arguments which might otherwise escape its consideration, or that amici curiae briefs would otherwise be of special assistance to the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motions by (A) Robert Abrams, President of the Borough of the Bronx, for leave to file a brief amicus curiae and (B) by Paul O’Dwyer and others as listed in the notice of motion herein for leave to file a brief amici curiae and to participate in the oral argument of the appeal herein denied upon the ground that there is no showing in the motion papers that appellants are not capable of a full and adequate presentation and that movants could remedy the deficiency, that movants would invite the . court’s attention to law or arguments which might otherwise escape its consideration, or that amici curiae briefs would otherwise be of special assistance to the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 N.E.2d 877, 34 N.Y.2d 552, 354 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/210-east-68th-street-corp-v-city-rent-agency-ny-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack