"21" Brands, Inc. v. United States

47 Cust. Ct. 350
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 23, 1961
DocketNo. 66175; protest 60/22917 (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 47 Cust. Ct. 350 ("21" Brands, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
"21" Brands, Inc. v. United States, 47 Cust. Ct. 350 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that 12 cases of liquor reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by [351]*351the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Browne Vintners Co.
34 C.C.P.A. 112 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 Cust. Ct. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/21-brands-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1961.