206 East 95th Street Associates v. Insurance of State of Pennsylvania

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

206 East 95th Street Associates v. Insurance of State of Pennsylvania

234 A.D.2d 21, 650 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12213

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 A.D.2d 21 (206 East 95th Street Associates v. Insurance of State of Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

206 East 95th Street Associates v. Insurance of State of Pennsylvania, 234 A.D.2d 21, 650 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered October 20, 1995, which granted defendant Tishman summary judgment and ordered defendant M&A to indemnify defendant Tishman for any judgment that may be obtained against it in the underlying litigation to a maximum of $5,000,000, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of also directing defendant M&A to provide a defense to defendant Tishman, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The subject language, even if drafted inartfully, does not create an ambiguity, since the parties’ intent is discernable (see, Calce v Futterman, 197 AD2d 490, lv denied 83 NY2d 755). Nor can the insurance rider reasonably "be parsed in two different, equally logical ways” (Delaware Otsego Corp. v Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 192 AD2d 911, 912, lv dismissed 82 NY2d 705). A "determination with respect to liability for the contract breach need not await a final determination as to the underlying liability” (Spencer v B.A. Painting Co., 224 AD2d 307). Further, "[t]he penalty for breaching this agreement to procure such insurance is to be liable for all resulting damages”, and such "damages include costs of defending a third-party suit” (Morel v City of New York, 192 AD2d 428, 429). We have considered defendant M&A Plumbing’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered October 20, 1995, which granted defendant Tishman summary judgment and ordered defendant M&A to indemnify defendant Tishman for any judgment that may be obtained against it in the underlying litigation to a maximum of $5,000,000, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of also directing defendant M&A to provide a defense to defendant Tishman, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The subject language, even if drafted inartfully, does not create an ambiguity, since the parties’ intent is discernable (see, Calce v Futterman, 197 AD2d 490, lv denied 83 NY2d 755). Nor can the insurance rider reasonably "be parsed in two different, equally logical ways” (Delaware Otsego Corp. v Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 192 AD2d 911, 912, lv dismissed 82 NY2d 705). A "determination with respect to liability for the contract breach need not await a final determination as to the underlying liability” (Spencer v B.A. Painting Co., 224 AD2d 307). Further, "[t]he penalty for breaching this agreement to procure such insurance is to be liable for all resulting damages”, and such "damages include costs of defending a third-party suit” (Morel v City of New York, 192 AD2d 428, 429). We have considered defendant M&A Plumbing’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D.2d 21, 650 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/206-east-95th-street-associates-v-insurance-of-state-of-pennsylvania-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack